by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
The global crisis inherited by the Obama Presidency, as well as the extraordinary success of LaRouche’s July 25, 2007 forecast of the current collapse, demonstrate the need for “a sweeping, fundamental change in the future meaning of the very name of economics, sweeping aside everything which had been considered professional expertise” up to the point of that forecast. Solid, long-ranging measures, LaRouche writes, must be crafted and put into place soon. This report is focussed on those conceptions that are most important, among such urgent “long haul” elements of policy.
by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
Economists from Stanford, Berkeley, and Princeton, part of an advisory group recommending policy to the Obama Administration, are studying LaRouche’s “Typical Collapse Function” as a model for economic analysis. In this excerpt from his Jan. 22 webcast, LaRouche responds to a question as to how he was able to forecast this dynamic.
by John Hoefle
The international Brutish oligarchy’s bankers will scream, but let them. They probably need the oxygen, anyway.
by Michael Kirsch
Nothing is more crucial for the survival of the United States and Russia than for the Obama Administration to understand how Russia is dealing with the current crisis, so as best to open the door for a strong partnership with Russia.
by Dennis Small
The drug trade and its “black economy” are infecting the world financial system with its more than a trillion dollars a year, while other sources of liquidity are drying up.
by Dean Andromidas
To be successful, U.S. envoy George Mitchell is going to have to outflank British moves for perpetual war in South West Asia.
by Hussein Askary
by Ramtanu Maitra
by Jeffrey Steinberg and Nancy Spannaus
Lyndon LaRouche has called for the Speaker of the House to be given the boot for her role in the bank bailout swindle, and her sabotage of LaRouche’s Homeowners and Bank Protection Act, which would have provided a solution to the crisis of the United States back in 2007.
by David Shavin
No better honor for Mendelssohn’s 200th birthday could be imagined, than to expunge the besmirching of his name by his enemies who spread the characterization, still heard today, that he was “gentlemanly,” without telling the truth about him: that he was perhaps the best example of that which Friedrich Schiller had fought for—a beautiful soul, aesthetically educated.