FROM EIR DAILY ALERTTrump’s Strategy Choosing Singapore and Vietnam for Kim SummitsMarch 3, 2019 (EIRNS)—Graham Allison, in a commentary in The National Interest on March 1, states that the chorus of naysayers calling the Kim-Trump summit a “failure” have missed the point. He points to the Reagan-Gorbachev summit in Reykjavik in October 1986, in which Reagan was not only interested in the arms deal, but in “the mind of an autocrat whom he thought he could persuade to try to transform his entire country” [emphasis in original]. Allison does not identify the real cause for Reagan walking away from the deal—i.e., LaRouche’s SDI, which Gorbachev and Reagan’s advisors wanted to trade away but which Reagan refused to give up, which ended up confirming LaRouche’s warning to Moscow that the U.S.S.R. would collapse economically if they refused to cooperate on the SDI. But Allison also makes clear that President Donald Trump’s selection of Singapore and Vietnam for the two summits was a brilliant strategic move.
In fact, North Korean press is placing a major focus on Kim’s state visit with Vietnam, both before and after the summit with Trump. While in Hanoi, Kim met with President Nguyen Phu Trong, who is also the general secretary of the Communist Party, at the Presidential Palace, then met separately with Prime Minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc. He also toured several industrial sites before being given a grand send-off on his train ride back to North Korea. The “Vietnam model” is now an active concept in North Korea, whereas Kim, like his father, has been very hesitant to discuss or implement the similar “China model”—the massive neighbor which Koreans on both sides of the DMZ are glad to cooperate with, but hesitant to be dominated by. |
|||