by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
The deeper subject-matter of this report, is the objective form of the presently onrushing, global economic disaster, a general economic breakdown-crisis which presently grips the world in its entirety, which is a result of the disease of monetarist oligarchism. LaRouche first identifies some leading subjective factors which have impelled erring governments to bring that objective disaster down upon us all. The case of President Obama’s rapidly waning influence must be considered from the standpoint of these subjective factors.
Lyndon LaRouche charged that President Obama is continuing the “Unitary Executive” dictatorial powers assumed by George W. Bush after 9/11, on the grounds of an alleged threat of terror from Afghanistan.
by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
by Michele Steinberg
“Who’s Who” in the British zoo.
A letter to President Obama by Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), co-signed by 57 bipartisan Congressmen, demands a report to Congress on an exit strategy for Afghanistan.
by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
President Carter refuses to face the reality that the Arab-Israeli conflict is chiefly the result of the British monarchy’s playing of both sides against one another.
by John Hoefle
The United States has destroyed the economic productivity that generates national wealth, and has substituted for it the creation of history’s largest debt. Now the Federal government and 49 states are bankrupt, and the country is days away from the end of the fiscal year, at which point accounts must be settled.
by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
The London Telegraph cheers that the pound is soaring relative to the euro; in fact, both are falling.
by Karel Vereycken
by Nancy Spannaus
Helga Zepp-LaRouche, candidate for Chancellor in the German national parliamentary elections of Sept. 27, titled her third webcast presentation on Sept. 22, “What Will Happen After the October Crash?” and took the occasion to deliver a number of well-aimed shocks at both the German population, and other Europeans as well.
by Lawrence K. Freeman
Since the media conflict in Darfur can no longer be used to destabilize Sudan, those opposed to a unified nation have shifted their approach to directly attacking the Comprehensive Peace Agreement, reached in 2005 to stop civil war between northern and southern Sudan.
by Carl Osgood
by Ramtanu Maitra
As the Obama Administration is reviewing its options in Afghanistan, which could lead to a reconsideration of its strategy, those opposed to such a shift are saying it would open the United States to terrorist attack. Ramtanu Maitra shows that such an assessment is a lie, only being issued to rally those who want the Administration to adopt British imperial policy and lead America into another Vietnam War.
Reps: No More U.S. Troops to Afghanistan.